ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Radiologist-AI Collaboration for Ischemia Diagnosis in Small-Bowel Obstruction: Multicentric Development and External Validation of a Multimodal Deep Learning Model.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visceral arterial disease: imaging features and pattern-based evaluation on CT angiography.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Predictive models for intestinal obstruction: from clinical scores to artificial intelligence.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Advancing precision triage in strangulated small bowel obstruction: from static scores to dynamic multiparametric models.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop and externally validate a multimodal AI model for detecting ischemia complicating small-bowel obstruction (SBO). We combined 3D CT data with routine laboratory markers (C-reactive protein, neutrophil count) and, optionally, radiology report indication/history text. From two centers, 1350 CT examinations were curated; 771 confirmed SBO scans were used for model development with patient-level splits. Ischemia labels were defined by surgical confirmation within 24 h of imaging. Models (MViT, ResNet-101, DaViT) were trained as unimodal and multimodal variants. External testing was used for 66 independent cases from a third center. Four radiologists (two residents and two experts) read the test set with and without AI assistance. Performance was assessed using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals; predictions included a confidence score. The image-plus-laboratory model performed best on external testing (AUC 0.69 [0.59-0.79], sensitivity 0.89 [0.76-1.00], and specificity 0.44 [0.35-0.54]). Adding report text improved internal validation but did not generalize externally; image + text and full multimodal variants did not exceed image + laboratory performance. Across readers, baseline AUC ranged from 0.496 [0.361-0.640] to 0.745 [0.589-0.875] and increased with reader experience. With AI assistance, AUC ranged from 0.565 [0.419-0.717] to 0.845 [0.714-0.952] and from 0.519 [0.373-0.669] to 0.845 [0.708-0.954] when confidence scores were displayed, showing consistent but non-significant changes whatever the experience level. A multimodal model combining CT and lab data surpassed unimodal approaches for 24-h ischemia detection; as a triage-support tool, it showed a consistent but non-significant improvement in radiologist performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42056618What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.