Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056618›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Radiologist-AI Collaboration for Ischemia Diagnosis in Small-Bowel Obstruction: Multicentric Development and External Validation of a Multimodal Deep Learning Model.

Quentin Vanderbecq, Wen Fan Xia, Emilie Chouzenoux, Dima Smaily, Jean-Christophe Pesquet, Marc Zins, Mathilde Wagner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Quentin VanderbecqDepartment of Radiology, AP-HP.Sorbonne, Saint Antoine Hospital, 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France. q.vanderbecq@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8024-3445
Wen Fan XiaDepartment of Radiology, AP-HP.Sorbonne, Saint Antoine Hospital, 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Emilie ChouzenouxCVN, CentraleSupélec, INRIA Paris Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.
Dima SmailyDepartment of Radiology, AP-HP.Sorbonne, Saint Antoine Hospital, 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Jean-Christophe PesquetCVN, CentraleSupélec, INRIA Paris Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.
Marc ZinsDepartment of Medical Imaging, Saint Joseph Hospital, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.
Mathilde WagnerDepartment of Radiology, AP-HP.Sorbonne, Saint Antoine Hospital, 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to develop and externally validate a multimodal AI model for detecting ischemia complicating small-bowel obstruction (SBO). We combined 3D CT data with routine laboratory markers (C-reactive protein, neutrophil count) and, optionally, radiology report indication/history text. From two centers, 1350 CT examinations were curated; 771 confirmed SBO scans were used for model development with patient-level splits. Ischemia labels were defined by surgical confirmation within 24 h of imaging. Models (MViT, ResNet-101, DaViT) were trained as unimodal and multimodal variants. External testing was used for 66 independent cases from a third center. Four radiologists (two residents and two experts) read the test set with and without AI assistance. Performance was assessed using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals; predictions included a confidence score. The image-plus-laboratory model performed best on external testing (AUC 0.69 [0.59-0.79], sensitivity 0.89 [0.76-1.00], and specificity 0.44 [0.35-0.54]). Adding report text improved internal validation but did not generalize externally; image + text and full multimodal variants did not exceed image + laboratory performance. Across readers, baseline AUC ranged from 0.496 [0.361-0.640] to 0.745 [0.589-0.875] and increased with reader experience. With AI assistance, AUC ranged from 0.565 [0.419-0.717] to 0.845 [0.714-0.952] and from 0.519 [0.373-0.669] to 0.845 [0.708-0.954] when confidence scores were displayed, showing consistent but non-significant changes whatever the experience level. A multimodal model combining CT and lab data surpassed unimodal approaches for 24-h ischemia detection; as a triage-support tool, it showed a consistent but non-significant improvement in radiologist performance.

Indexed as

AbdomenArtificial intelligenceComputed tomographyDeep learningIntestinal obstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.