ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Evaluation of reagents for suspension-assisted total reflection X-ray fluorescence element analysis in biomedical samples.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In biomedical research, it is essential to be able to precisely and reliably quantify trace and microelements in complex biological matrices in order to identify deficiencies and understand disease mechanisms. Analytical methods that are sensitive, robust, and environmentally friendly are preferable. Suspension-assisted total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (SA-TXRF) is a simple to perform, multielement analytical method that can quantify trace elements in suspensions containing minute sample amounts. In this work, a systematic study comparing five different suspension reagents, namely concentrated and diluted nitric acid, Triton X-100, Triton X-114, and ultrapure water, for SA-TXRF analysis of trace and microelements in three biological reference materials (NIST 1577c, NIST 1486, and ERM-BB186) is presented. The analytical performance is compared in terms of trueness, precision, and sensitivity, and the resulting SA-TXRF methods were assessed for greenness using the Analytical Greenness Metric for Sample Preparation (AGREEprep). As a result, water is recommended as suspension reagent for soft biological material, while for hard biological material, i.e., bone meal, best results were achieved using the surfactant Triton X-114. All of the presented SA-TXRF methods demonstrate improved greenness compared to the standard method (EPA Method 3052), which involves sample preparation by microwave-assisted digestion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.