Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056502›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026

Evolution of surgical management and functional outcomes of craniopharyngiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Federico Valeri, Simone Antonio de Sanctis, Gianluca Trevisi, Jacopo Ciccani, Sabrina Chiloiro, Antonella Giampietro, Antonio Bianchi, Rosalinda Calandrelli, Ciro Mazzarella, Simona Gaudino and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Federico ValeriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. federicovaleri97@gmail.com.
Simone Antonio de SanctisFacoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Gianluca TrevisiDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, G. D'Annunzio University Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Jacopo CiccaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Sabrina ChiloiroDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pituitary Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonella GiampietroDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pituitary Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonio BianchiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pituitary Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Rosalinda CalandrelliRadiology and Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Ciro MazzarellaRadiology and Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Simona GaudinoRadiology and Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Mario RiganteDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Marco GessiDepartment of Woman and Child Health Sciences and Public Health, Anatomic Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Pier Paolo MattognoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Liverana LaurettiFacoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Francesco DogliettoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are rare benign epithelial tumors, whose management remains one of the most challenging feats in skull base surgery. Over recent decades, the evolution from transcranial microsurgical approaches (TCA) to extended endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEEA) has reshaped their management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the evolution of surgical treatment and define the functional outcomes of adult CP patients. A systematic review of the literature was carried out according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, including papers from PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid databases. Meta-analyses of proportions were conducted using random-effects models (REML estimator), with heterogeneity assessed via the I² statistic. Meta-regression analyses explored the influence of publication year and geographic origin. Thirty-one retrospective studies encompassing 1,855 adult patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age clustered between the fourth and fifth decades, with balanced sex distribution and follow-up durations ranging from 12 to 126 months. Preoperatively, anterior hypopituitarism occurred in 61.5%, diabetes insipidus (DI) in 19.7%, and obesity in 21.3% of patients. The majority of tumors were suprasellar-intraventricular (88.9%), with adamantinomatous histology predominating (72.2%). EEEA was the most used technique (57.4%), followed by TCA (35.6%). Gross total resection (GTR) rate was 68.1%, increasing to 76.2% in the EEEA subgroup. Meta-regression confirmed a significant temporal trend toward increased EEEA utilization (p = 0.040), while GTR rates remained stable over time. Postoperatively, hypopituitarism affected 79.6%, permanent DI 54.7%, and obesity 42.2% of patients; cognitive deficits were present in 10.6%. Recurrence occurred in 14.4% and all-cause mortality was 1.9%. The country of origin significantly influenced GTR outcomes (p = 0.004), reflecting institutional and technical variability. Egger’s test indicated no publication bias for EEEA rates (p = 0.683) but confirmed asymmetry for GTR (p < 0.001). The EEEA route is being increasingly favored for midline and suprasellar CPs, achieving robust rates of GTR (76.2%) for midline and suprasellar CPs, with higher visual improvement rates and acceptable morbidity in experienced hands. However, rates of postoperative endocrine and hypothalamic dysfunction remain high, highlighting the need for hypothalamic-sparing strategies and individualized surgical planning. Underreporting of hypothalamic invasion limits accurate interpretation of functional outcomes. Future prospective multicentric studies integrating molecular data, standardized neuropsychological assessment and clinical and surgical data reporting are essential to refine surgical decision-making and optimize quality of life for CP patients.

Indexed as

CraniopharyngiomaNeurosurgical ProceduresPituitary NeoplasmsHumansMicrosurgeryTreatment OutcomeCraniopharyngiomaEndoscopic endonasalHypothalamic syndromeObesityPituitaryTranscranial

Identifiers

PMID42056502
PMCPMC13128730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.