ArticleNature medicine2026
Predicting referral need for febrile children in low-resource community settings in South and Southeast Asia.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking triage for febrile children in low-resource settings.Nature medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In resource-constrained community settings, identifying which febrile children require referral remains a major unmet need. Current World Health Organization (WHO) danger signs have limited accuracy, resulting in missed severe illness and unnecessary referrals. Here we developed and validated clinical prediction models to support referral decisions using data from 3,405 children aged 1-59 months presenting with community-acquired acute febrile illnesses to seven hospitals across Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos and Vietnam. Cambodian data were held out for external validation. The model using simple clinical parameters (sensitivity 74.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.4-88.1); specificity 99.1% (95% CI: 97.7-99.7)) outperformed WHO criteria (sensitivity 55.5% (95% CI: 39.4-72.7); specificity 82.6% (95% CI: 77.1-87.6)) for identification of children at risk of severe disease (death or organ support within 2 days). Including either pulse oximetry or the host biomarker soluble TREM1 (sTREM1) increased sensitivity to 88.9% (95% CI: 76.7-97.8; pulse oximetry) and 89.2% (95% CI: 76.9-97.5; sTREM1), respectively. The pulse oximetry-based model achieved these gains with a threefold reduction in referral rates. These approaches appear cost-effective (pulse oximetry incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) = $26.28; sTREM1 ICER = $196.46) and could improve triage for febrile illness in low-resource settings by enabling more accurate referral decisions. They warrant evaluation in community-based trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.