ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Pacinian corpuscle loss on routine forefoot MRI as an imaging biomarker for large-fiber sensory dysfunction in type 2 diabetic polyneuropathy.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the relationship between Pacinian corpuscle (PC) count on forefoot MRI in diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP) and large-fiber sensory dysfunction as quantified by nerve conduction studies (NCS). MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty-nine patients with type 2 diabetes and neurologically confirmed DSP (mean age 67.9 ± 13.5 years; 29 males) underwent forefoot MRI and NCS, including compound muscle and sensory nerve action potentials (cMAP, sNAP) and conduction velocities of tibial, peroneal, and sural nerves. PC counts were assessed in the subcutaneous and deep regions of each digit. Spearman's rank correlation analysis examined the relationship between total PC counts and sural sNAP amplitudes.
resultsBased on motor and sensory amplitudes and age-adjusted conduction velocities of NCS, 10 patients were classified as having mild-to-moderate DSP, and 29 as having severe DSP. Severe DSP was associated with sensory large-fiber impairment, with 86.1% of patients showing abolished sural sNAP amplitudes. Total PC counts were significantly lower in severe cases compared to mild-to-moderate polyneuropathy (54.1 ± 40.6 vs 146.1 ± 43.2; p < 0.001). Spearman's rank correlation analysis revealed a strong positive association between PC counts and sural sNAP amplitudes (ρ = 0.638, p < 0.001). Likewise, patients with severe DSP had substantially reduced or absent sural sNAP amplitudes (median [range]: 0.1 [0.1-1.7] µV) and lower PC counts, while those with mild-to-moderate DSP showed both higher sural sNAP amplitudes (median [range]: 2.3 [0.9-11.4] µV) and PC counts (p < 0.001).
conclusionForefoot MRI-detected PC counts closely correlate with large-fiber sensory function in DSP, supporting their potential as noninvasive imaging biomarkers of polyneuropathy severity. KEY POINTS: Question DSP is linked to loss of PC on forefoot MRI; however, it remains unclear whether the number of PC correlates with DSP severity. Findings Forefoot MRI showed lower PC counts in patients with severe DSP than in those with mild-to-moderate disease and indicated a strong association between PC loss and electrophysiological measures of large-fiber sensory dysfunction. Clinical relevance MRI-based PC quantification is a promising imaging biomarker for large-fiber sensory dysfunction in DSP, complementing established clinical and electrophysiological methods for diagnosing and assessing DSP severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42056490What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.