ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026
Developing broad brains: the importance of an early introduction to evolutionary thinking in undergraduate neuroscience programs.
Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There have been a number of calls for neuroscience to embrace a wider range of model systems. Authors of these opinion pieces have emphasized the inherent value of explicitly evolutionary and comparative work in neuroscience and the value of diversity in applied and biomedical research. However, few of these papers address the role of undergraduate neuroscience education in preparing students to pursue, much less value, evolutionary and comparative neuroscience. Here, we argue that the field of neuroscience would benefit from the explicit inclusion of evolutionary and comparative neuroscience in introductory courses. We first review the state of introductory neuroscience curricula and available teaching materials, before discussing the importance of an early introduction to evolutionary and comparative ideas, challenges to incorporating these ideas into introductory courses, and finally offer a number of strategies to increase student awareness of the diversity of systems available for neuroscience research. We speculate that introducing students to evolutionary and comparative neuroscience early in their education may increase retention of students with an evolutionary or comparative bent, which may increase the number of researchers interested in pursuing these questions in their careers, while also making students bound for health, biomedical research, or engineering professions more aware of the value of evolutionary and comparative approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42056470What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.