Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056470›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

Developing broad brains: the importance of an early introduction to evolutionary thinking in undergraduate neuroscience programs.

Megan D Gall, Justin C Touchon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Megan D GallBiology Department, Vassar College, 124 Raymond Ave, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12604, USA. megall@vassar.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0032-8164
Justin C TouchonBiology Department, Vassar College, 124 Raymond Ave, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12604, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1643-348X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been a number of calls for neuroscience to embrace a wider range of model systems. Authors of these opinion pieces have emphasized the inherent value of explicitly evolutionary and comparative work in neuroscience and the value of diversity in applied and biomedical research. However, few of these papers address the role of undergraduate neuroscience education in preparing students to pursue, much less value, evolutionary and comparative neuroscience. Here, we argue that the field of neuroscience would benefit from the explicit inclusion of evolutionary and comparative neuroscience in introductory courses. We first review the state of introductory neuroscience curricula and available teaching materials, before discussing the importance of an early introduction to evolutionary and comparative ideas, challenges to incorporating these ideas into introductory courses, and finally offer a number of strategies to increase student awareness of the diversity of systems available for neuroscience research. We speculate that introducing students to evolutionary and comparative neuroscience early in their education may increase retention of students with an evolutionary or comparative bent, which may increase the number of researchers interested in pursuing these questions in their careers, while also making students bound for health, biomedical research, or engineering professions more aware of the value of evolutionary and comparative approaches.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBrainNeurosciencesAcademiaAnimalsCurriculumHumansEvolutionNeurosciencePedagogyTeachingUndergraduate education

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.