ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026
Acceptability and usability of a brief video report-back to share individualized residential indoor air quality data.
Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05224076 (The Changing COVID-19 Landscape), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Changing COVID-19 Landscape: A Feasibility Study to Capture Momentary Residential Environmental Exposures and Asthma Symptoms in Adults
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReport-back of research results is the sharing of research findings with participants to assess knowledge attainment and behavior change.
objectiveTo explore acceptability and usability of a brief video report-back for indoor air quality data among adults with uncontrolled asthma.
methodsParticipants (n = 37) were emailed a link to a short video describing levels of volatile organic compounds and particulates assessed in their home. These data included measurements using an indoor air quality monitor over a 2-week period. Acceptability/usability were assessed using an 11-item electronic survey.
resultsEach video was viewed twice, on average, (range 1-13 views) with a survey response rate of 43% (n = 16). Respondents noted high usability; agreed information was useful (94%), they would complete one or more action steps (75%), and recommended video report-back in future studies (88%). SIGNIFICANCE: Video report-back can be a usable and acceptable approach for sharing air quality research findings with participants.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05224076; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05224076 IMPACT STATEMENT: This study explores the acceptability and usability of a brief video report-back for indoor air quality data results among adults with uncontrolled asthma in the United States. Video report-back can be a usable and acceptable approach for sharing research findings with participants. The video format for report-back offers an additional avenue for sharing environmental health data and has the potential to improve science communication and prompt behavior change. The video format for report-back can be an acceptable and usable format for sharing environmental health data and has the potential to improve science communication and prompt health behavior change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42056445What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.