ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Molecular heterogeneity of ERBB2-altered cancers: A pan-cancer landscape across US and Japanese cohorts.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated Analysis of HER2 Expression and ERBB2 Alterations in Bladder Cancer.Cancer science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Therapies targeting ERBB2 (HER2) are rapidly expanding toward tissue-agnostic indications. However, the diversity of ERBB2-altered tumors across different cancer types and populations remains poorly characterized. We performed a comprehensive pan-cancer molecular analysis of ERBB2-altered tumors using two large clinical genomic datasets: AACR Project GENIE (n = 210,640) and the nationwide Japanese comprehensive genomic profiling database (C-CAT; n = 80,600). Across all cancer types, the prevalence of ERBB2 mutations was 1.4% in GENIE and 2.2% in C-CAT, whereas ERBB2 amplification occurred in 2.1% and 6.5% of tumors, respectively. Kinase domain mutations such as L755S in breast cancer and Y772_A775dup in lung cancer were enriched in a cancer type-specific manner, while R678Q in the juxtamembrane domain was common in colorectal and gastroesophageal cancers. ERBB2 compound mutations were rare (<1% in both cohorts) and did not significantly impact overall survival in the cohort treated predominantly before the advent of novel HER2-selective targeted therapies. ERBB2 mutations and amplifications also displayed divergent co-mutational landscapes: mutations frequently co-occurred with ARID1A mutations, whereas amplifications were enriched for TP53 mutations and CCNE1 amplification. In colorectal cancer, ERBB2 mutations were associated with higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) and frequent KRAS co-mutations, while in lung adenocarcinoma, ERBB2 amplifications exhibited higher TMB and a heavier co-mutation burden. A survival analysis revealed that specific co-occurring alterations, including MAP2K1 mutations in colorectal cancer and CCNE1 amplification in breast cancer, were associated with distinct prognostic outcomes among ERBB2-amplified cases. Our findings demonstrate that "ERBB2-altered cancer" is not a homogenous entity. Optimizing precision oncology for ERBB2 requires integrating histological context, specific alteration types, and co-mutation profiles to guide therapeutic selection and overcome resistance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.