Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056390›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Exploring the effect of cognitive factors in lipreading: The roles of auditory-verbal learning, inhibition, verbal fluency, and visuospatial working memory.

Hale Hancer, Nilgun Ulger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hale HancerSpeech and Language Therapy Department, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey. halehancer@baskent.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4937-114X
Nilgun UlgerSpeech and Language Therapy Department, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8662-8349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipreading is a critical component of communication; however, substantial individual differences in performance have been consistently observed. Although several cognitive factors have been proposed as potential determinants of lipreading ability, empirical evidence supporting these associations is limited. This study investigated the roles of auditory-verbal learning, verbal fluency, inhibition, and visuospatial working memory in adults' lipreading. The study was conducted in two phases. First, the Lipreading Test (LRT) was developed through a literature review, expert evaluation, and a preliminary study. The LRT consists of 50 items across phoneme, word, sentence, and question-answer subtests. Item analysis showed balanced difficulty (pj = 0.30-0.90) and strong discrimination (dj = 0.30-0.83). Data from 420 participants were used to establish the construct validity, discriminant validity, and reliability of the scale. The item-total correlations ranged from .501 to .898. Exploratory factor analysis (n = 170) revealed a two-factor structure (eigenvalue = 2.92) explaining 56.18% of the variance, confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis (n = 200). Discriminant validity analysis (n = 100) indicated that performance on the LRT demonstrated significant differentiation by gender and hearing loss onset. Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency (α = .831), test-retest correlations (r = .404-.961), and interrater reliability (κ = .91-.99). In phase 2, hierarchical regression (n = 96) indicated that gender, auditory-verbal learning, verbal fluency, visuospatial memory, and inhibition together accounted for 21.8% of variance in lipreading performance (p < .05). Lipreading emerges from the combined influence of multiple cognitive processes, highlighting the importance of an integrated assessment.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalLipreadingMemory, Short-TermSpace PerceptionSpeech PerceptionVerbal LearningAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAuditory–verbal learningInhibitionLipreadingSpeechreadingVerbal fluencyWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID42056390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.