Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056377›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Signal detection of adverse events in medical devices using natural language processing: a case study in pelvic mesh.

Thu-Lan Kelly, Ty Stanford, Curtis Murray, Lewis Mitchell, Indu Bala, Nicole Pratt, Tobin South, Renly Lim, Marianne Gillam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thu-Lan KellySchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia. Lan.Kelly@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7691-9289
Ty StanfordSchool of Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.
Curtis MurraySchool of Information and Computing Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Lewis MitchellSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.
Indu BalaSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.
Nicole PrattSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.
Tobin SouthMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, USA.
Renly LimSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.
Marianne GillamSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 2002589NHMRC 2002589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disproportionality analysis is used to detect safety signals for post-market surveillance from adverse events reported to regulatory bodies but is challenging when reports contain unstructured free-text. We implemented a proof-of-concept system combining natural language processing of free-text data with disproportionality analysis, using a known safety signal from pelvic mesh. Free-text reports in an Australian spontaneous adverse event report database between 2012 and 2017 were classified using topic modelling. 'Pain' was the most frequent clinical topic and was a known adverse event from pelvic mesh. Signal detection with three different comparators (hernia mesh, hernia and other mesh and all other devices) was performed every quarter with three disproportionality methods (Proportional Reporting Ratio, Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network and maximised Sequential Probability Ratio Test). All methods adjusted the Type I error threshold for multiple looks at the data. A safety signal for pelvic mesh compared with hernia and other mesh was detected by all three methods in 3rd quarter of 2014, three years before the device was withdrawn from Australia in November 2017. Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network most reliably accounted for uncertainty in the pain classification. Further investigation is required with other devices and databases to validate our proof-of-concept system.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingSurgical MeshAustraliaBayes TheoremDatabases, FactualHumansNeural Networks, ComputerDisproportionality analysisMedical deviceNatural language processingPelvic meshPost-market surveillanceSignal detection

Identifiers

PMID42056377
PMCPMC13319759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.