ArticleScientific reports2026
A need-driven design research of modular functional armchairs for young adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a need-driven framework for the modular design of functional armchairs for young adults living alone. It aims to establish a systematic linkage among user-need priorities, functional organization, and product architecture generation. User needs were collected through observations, interviews, and questionnaires, leading to the identification of 15 core functions. These functions were transformed into 11 functional modules using function-structure mapping, correlation assessment, and hierarchical clustering. AHP was applied to determine evaluation weights, and TOPSIS was used to compare design alternatives. The results show that the optimized solution better aligns with user expectations in both functionality and experience. The study contributes a need-to-module translation mechanism that positions modularization as an intermediate decision layer between need prioritization and product implementation. This framework establishes a traceable pathway linking user needs, module generation, and design evaluation, offering methodological support for complex product design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.