Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056316›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Running virtual reality experiments online: A brief introduction and tutorial.

Levi Kumle, Alfie Brazier, Joel Kovoor, Johannes Keil, Anna C Nobre, Dejan Draschkow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Levi KumleDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. levi.kumle@psy.ox.ac.uk.
Alfie BrazierDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Joel KovoorDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Johannes KeilDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Anna C NobreWu Tsai Institute and Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
Dejan DraschkowDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Clarendon Fund Studentship to LKWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104571/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 203139/A/16/ZWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving meaningful and representative findings in cognitive/behavioural research requires both externally valid experimental settings and representative participant samples. Virtual reality (VR) has become a powerful tool for enhancing realism while maintaining control of experimental environments. Simultaneously, online testing broadens and diversifies samples. Combining these approaches-running VR experiments online-is compelling but remains challenging due to incompatibilities between tools used in lab-based VR studies and online testing. This paper offers a practical solution to bridge this gap. We provide a brief overview of current approaches to online VR experimentation and offer a step-by-step tutorial for converting lab-based VR studies into remote deployments using Unity and Steam. Further, we share an open-source onlineVR-toolbox-including code, example workflows, and practical Notebooks-to facilitate critical processes such as secure data transfer and participant management. To validate this approach, we present a proof-of-concept case study replicating a well-established memory effect. Our results demonstrate that remote data collection via Steam is technically feasible and yields results consistent with laboratory-based findings. Together, our tutorial, tools, and case study show that online VR studies are possible and practical, opening the door to more scalable, inclusive, and externally valid behavioural science.

Indexed as

Virtual RealityHumansInternetSoftwareUser-Computer InterfaceOnline data collectionOnlineVR-toolboxVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42056316
PMCPMC13128755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.