ArticleScientific reports2026
Exploring the role of marital status on survival and stage at diagnosis in early-onset colorectal cancer by race/ethnicity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined the relationship of marital status on cause-specific survival and late-stage at diagnosis for early-onset colorecta cancer (EO-CRC), overall and within five racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic White [NHW], non-Hispanic Black [NHB], American Indian/Alaskan Native [AI/AN], Asian/ Pacific Islanders [PI], or Hispanic). We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using data from 2006 to 2015 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. The Kaplan-Meier method, multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, and logistical regression models were performed. Among 58,884 participants, the lower five-year survival rate was 66.4% for EO-CRC patients who were unmarried (p-value < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate was the lowest for NHB patients (64.9% vs. 69.7% for AI/AN, 70.1% for Hispanic, 72.2% for Asian/PI, and 72.8% for NHW). Unmarried NHW (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% CI, 1.19-1.30), NHB (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.18-1.39), Asian/PI (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32), and Hispanic patients (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.19) were more likely to die from CRC than those were married. Further, unmarried NHW (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.22), NHB (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.38), and Asian/PI patients (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00-1.38) had a risk for a later stage at diagnosis for CRC. We observed lowest five-year survival rate among unmarried patients. Culturally sensitive interventions aimed at improving EO-CRC survival may benefit individuals across all racial groups. Such efforts can be strengthened by enhancing social support networks and increasing CRC risk awareness as well as equitable access to care, particularly for NHW, NHB, and Asian/PI populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.