ArticleScientific reports2026
Using machine learning to identify the most important predictors of fatty liver index in healthy young Taiwanese men.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide. While many factors have been associated with NAFLD, their relative importance in healthy young populations remains unclear. In this study, we enrolled 7,037 healthy young Taiwanese men aged 20-50 years and applied five machine learning (Mach-L) methods to identify the most important predictors of the fatty liver index (FLI). Two models were constructed: Model 1 included all 28 variables, while Model 2 excluded body fat (BF) to unmask the contribution of other factors. In Model 1, BF was the most important predictor (100% relative importance), followed by serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT; 34.54%), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; 16.51%), age (9.91%), uric acid (UA; 7.17%), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG; 6.25%). In Model 2, after removing BF, the most important predictors were SGPT (100%), HDL-C (36.82%), UA (24.90%), C-reactive protein (21.23%), age (10.05%), and FPG (8.17%). All five machine learning methods outperformed traditional multiple linear regression. These findings highlight the central role of adiposity while also revealing the independent contributions of metabolic, inflammatory, and hepatic factors to FLI in young healthy men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.