ArticleScientific reports2026
Sex differences in three-dimensional intra-cycle velocity fluctuation and performance during freestyle swimming among high-level swimmers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined sex differences in three-dimensional intra-cycle velocity fluctuations (IVFs) of the body's center of mass and the relationship between IVFs and swimming velocity (Vswim) in high-level swimmers during freestyle. Maximal-effort freestyle sprints performed by 13 high-level athletes (7 males and 6 females) were captured using a Qualisys three-dimensional motion capture system. Given the limited sample size, robust statistical approaches, including Welch's t-tests, Bayesian analyses, and permutation tests were applied. Male swimmers exhibited significantly higher Vswim (p < 0.001, ES = 2.94), forward IVF (p < 0.001, ES = 2.47), and vertical IVF (p = 0.022, ES = 1.57) compared with female swimmers. Bayesian analysis of interaction terms revealed no statistically significant moderating effect of sex on the relationship between IVF and Vswim. These findings indicate that although clear sex differences are evident in specific IVF components and swimming speed among high-level swimmers, the functional relationship between IVF and performance remains statistically consistent across sexes. From a practical perspective, IVF-based interventions should integrate sex-related physiological characteristics with individualized technical profiling to avoid overgeneralization. This study also establishes a high-fidelity methodological reference for three-dimensional kinematic analysis, providing a valuable dataset for future research and technological validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.