ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Reinforcement learning based automated anesthesia system for gastrointestinal endoscopy with a multicenter randomized trial.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06857344 (Automated Anesthesia System-Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Automated Anesthesia System-Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (AAS-GE): a Reinforcement Learning Based Control for Anesthesia During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing demand for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, coupled with a global shortage of anesthesiologists, underscores the need for intelligent automation in anesthesia care. Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a promising strategy for autonomous anesthesia control, yet prospective clinical validation remains limited. We developed an RL-based automated anesthesia system for gastrointestinal endoscopy (AAS-GE) for automated ciprofol delivery and conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial across four centers in China between January 8 and August 27, 2025. Adults aged 18-65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomized 1:1 to receive either AAS-GE-controlled anesthesia or clinician-managed manual anesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as oxygen saturation below 92%, with secondary outcomes assessing hypoxemia severity, induction time, drug use, recovery, and adverse events. A total of 509 participants were included in algorithm development, and 418 were enrolled for clinical validation. The incidence of hypoxemia was comparable between groups (14.42 vs. 14.29%; odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.59-1.75; P = 0.968), with no significant differences in secondary safety outcomes. AAS-GE achieved a shorter induction time (median 1.55 vs. 1.90 min; P < 0.001) without increasing total drug dose or recovery time. However, intraoperative body movement was more frequent in the AAS-GE group, consistent with lighter anesthesia depth. These results demonstrate the non-inferior safety and efficacy of AAS-GE compared with clinician management, supporting its potential to improve efficiency and standardize sedation care. Clinical registration: ClinicalTrials.gov on Feb. 26, 2025 (NCT06857344).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.