Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056274›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Reinforcement learning based automated anesthesia system for gastrointestinal endoscopy with a multicenter randomized trial.

Hai-Long Bing, Yan Wang, Shi-Ying Li, Yuan-Wen Li, Qi-Min Wang, Liu-Mei Li, Sheng-Qun Liu, Zhen-Hua Hu, Tian-Wei Wang, Qing-Wang Lu and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06857344 (Automated Anesthesia System-Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06857344 narecruitingnot on this map

Automated Anesthesia System-Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (AAS-GE): a Reinforcement Learning Based Control for Anesthesia During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston Intelligent Medical Research Center, Shenzhen United Scheme Technology Co., Ltd.Ran2025 to 2025Enrolled164ConditionsAnesthesia InductionArmsAI Controlled General Anesthesia, General Anesthesia (GA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Hai-Long Bing *Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yan Wang *Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Shi-Ying Li *Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yuan-Wen LiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Qi-Min WangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Liu-Mei LiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Sheng-Qun LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Zhen-Hua HuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Tian-Wei WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anxi Hospital, Anxi, Fujian, China.
Qing-Wang LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jinjiang Municipal Hospital (Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Fujian Hospital), Jinjiang, Fujian, China.
Ran RanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Yi WuInstitute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, Beijing, China.
Shu-Sheng XuInstitute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, Beijing, China.
Hui-Jie LiFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
Jian HuoIntelligent Medical Research Center, Shenzhen United Scheme Technology Company Limited, Boston, MA, USA.
Chen LiuBiomedical Engineering Center, Shenzhen United Scheme Technology Company Limited, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
An-Min HuBiomedical Engineering Center, Shenzhen United Scheme Technology Company Limited, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Zheng-Yuan XiaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. zyxia@zzu.edu.cn.
Qin-Jun ChuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. mzk123456@zzu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing demand for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, coupled with a global shortage of anesthesiologists, underscores the need for intelligent automation in anesthesia care. Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a promising strategy for autonomous anesthesia control, yet prospective clinical validation remains limited. We developed an RL-based automated anesthesia system for gastrointestinal endoscopy (AAS-GE) for automated ciprofol delivery and conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial across four centers in China between January 8 and August 27, 2025. Adults aged 18-65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomized 1:1 to receive either AAS-GE-controlled anesthesia or clinician-managed manual anesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as oxygen saturation below 92%, with secondary outcomes assessing hypoxemia severity, induction time, drug use, recovery, and adverse events. A total of 509 participants were included in algorithm development, and 418 were enrolled for clinical validation. The incidence of hypoxemia was comparable between groups (14.42 vs. 14.29%; odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.59-1.75; P = 0.968), with no significant differences in secondary safety outcomes. AAS-GE achieved a shorter induction time (median 1.55 vs. 1.90 min; P < 0.001) without increasing total drug dose or recovery time. However, intraoperative body movement was more frequent in the AAS-GE group, consistent with lighter anesthesia depth. These results demonstrate the non-inferior safety and efficacy of AAS-GE compared with clinician management, supporting its potential to improve efficiency and standardize sedation care. Clinical registration: ClinicalTrials.gov on Feb. 26, 2025 (NCT06857344).

Identifiers

PMID42056274
PMCPMC13365557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.