ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Improving future care: the role of oncofertility education in medical curricula in Germany. Results of a nationwide survey of 346 medical students.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the existing knowledge, interests, and attitudes of medical students regarding fertility preservation measures.
designA multi-center nationwide survey was conducted among medical students across Germany. The survey consisted of 15 multiple-choice questions and six questions asking participants their level of agreement of a statement. SUBJECTS: 346 medical students in Germany.
main outcome measuresA multiple-choice questionnaire was used to evaluate the existing knowledge, interest and attitudes of medical students regarding fertility preservation measures.
resultsRegarding the assessment of ovarian reserve, Anti-Müllerian hormone testing was known by 38.8% of students, while only 15.9% were familiar with the antral follicle count method. The most widely recognized fertility preservation (FP) method was oocyte cryopreservation (91.0%), followed by ovarian tissue cryopreservation (45.1%), ovarian transposition surgery prior to pelvic radiation (38.2%), and the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs for ovarian protection during chemotherapy (28.6%). Regarding reproductive technologies, such as IVF, ICSI, or hormonal stimulation, 87.5% of students expressed a positive opinion. Oocyte donation was perceived positively by 77.6%. The acceptance for uterus transplantation was high among participants with 61.4%. The acceptance for surrogacy was lower with 53.2% of respondents. Social freezing was positively received by most respondents (72.7%). 80.0% of respondents expressed interest in expanding their knowledge of fertility and cancer, and 65.9% desired additional training.
conclusionsTo ensure high-quality fertility preservation counseling and the implementation of necessary FP measures for all cancer patients of childbearing age, it is crucial that future physicians are familiar with methods for assessing ovarian reserve and fertility preservation techniques. Strengthening oncofertility training in medical education will enhance future physicians' ability to provide informed counseling and timely referrals, ultimately improving patient care and quality of life. This study highlights the urgent need to systematically integrate fertility preservation and oncofertility into the curriculum of medical schools in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.