ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Institutional trust and vaccination delay as key metrics for vaccination rollout success.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTimely vaccination effectively reduced COVID-19 hospitalizations and mortality, yet vaccination hesitancy undermined this benefit. Understanding the factors contributing to hesitancy is critical for improving future pandemic control by identifying barriers to timely vaccination. This paper operationalizes hesitancy in terms of vaccine delay-a key public health metric that reflects changing vaccination policies and infection status, factors that can alter individuals' eligibility, and real-world complexities like infections.
methodUsing longitudinal data from the earliest stage of the pandemic in Hong Kong, we examined how institutional trust and the 5C constructs (confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation, and collective responsibility) influenced both vaccination intention and timing.
resultsOur results show that only 34.89% and 42.97% of vaccinated participants received their first and third doses within 100 days of eligibility, respectively, despite rising uptake prior to government mandates. Confidence and vaccination intention are key predictors of delay, and higher institutional trust boosts both confidence and collective responsibility, thereby enhancing intention and reducing delays.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the importance of building institutional trust and public confidence to minimize vaccine delay, particularly among vulnerable populations. Ultimately, incorporating vaccine delay as a key metric into public health strategies can guide more effective interventions and strengthen pandemic preparedness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.