Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056236›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Key concept learning for medical vision language model with reasoning capabilities.

Wei Lou, Yue Wu, Pusheng Xu, Weiyi Zhang, Xiaolan Chen, Jiancheng Yang, Mingguang He, Danli Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wei Lou *College of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Yue Wu *School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Pusheng XuSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Weiyi ZhangSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Xiaolan ChenSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Jiancheng YangSwiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mingguang HeSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China. mingguang.he@polyu.edu.hk.
Danli ShiSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China. danli.shi@polyu.edu.hk.

Funding

Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LQN26F020029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training medical vision-language models (VLMs) typically demands millions of image-text pairs to achieve versatility and reasoning, posing significant challenges in data acquisition. We propose ConceptVLM, a novel data-efficient fine-tuning paradigm that transforms general-domain VLMs into specialized medical ones with minimal labeled data, integrating medical knowledge without disrupting the model's existing general capabilities. Central to our approach is a key concept-aware training strategy, building a structured medical concept dictionary and employing masked attention to guide the model's focus toward essential clinical concepts. This focused fine-tuning enhances domain-specific comprehension while preserving the model's reasoning abilities and response diversity. Experiments across multimodal medical benchmarks show ConceptVLM achieves state-of-the-art results using only 1% of the original training data, outperforming traditional methods reliant on large-scale QA datasets. These findings challenge the prevailing reliance on extensive annotated corpora, demonstrating key concept-guided tuning as a viable path to developing cognitively capable medical VLMs.

Identifiers

PMID42056236
PMCPMC13338256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.