ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluating neural encoding of prosody-related F0 changes in emotional speech using the speech FFR in normal-hearing adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emotional information in speech is conveyed through prosodic cues, including variations in fundamental frequency (F0 contour), intensity, and duration. Emotion perception has been largely studied behaviorally but the neural mechanisms underlying it are not well understood. The Speech-evoked Frequency Following Response (FFR) is a non-invasive neural measure reflecting the encoding of speech acoustics in the auditory system. This study investigated the extent to which the FFR can represent prosody-related F0 contours and compared neural responses between male and female listeners. Sixteen normal-hearing adults underwent FFR recording in response to the word "balloon" spoken with sad and happy emotion by a male and a female talker. Using a pitch-tracking algorithm, F0 tracking accuracy was quantified via Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and an accuracy percentage. The results showed that the FFR can track emotional F0 contours; however, the degree of accuracy is modulated by the acoustic characteristics of emotions and talker's voice. Sad emotional speech and the male talker voice were associated with enhanced F0 tracking, consistent with their acoustic features. On the other hand, F0 tracking accuracy did not differ by listener sex. These findings provide new insights into the use of FFR as a neural measure for prosody assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.