ArticleScientific reports2026
Light and ultrasonic noise pollution displaces trawling Daubenton's bats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bats evolved the ability to echolocate prey in night sky, but this dark and quiet sensory niche is increasingly encroached upon by anthropogenic light and noise pollution. Here, we test the hypotheses that such pollutions displace bats from their foraging sites and that the displacement increases with stressor intensity. To do so we exposed wild Daubenton's bats (Myotis daubentonii) to controlled levels of light or ultrasonic broad-band noise and recorded bat activity levels via passive acoustic monitoring at different distances to the stressors. We find that light-, and noise-exposures reduced bat activity by 43% and 49% respectively compared to control periods within 6m of the stressor source. The displacement effect decreased with increasing distance to the light and noise sources. At 20m from the source, light levels of 1 Lux still exerted a modest reduction in bat activity. By contrast, at 20 m, noise levels of 56 dB re. 20μPa RMS no longer elicited a measurable displacement of bats. We conclude that moderate anthropogenic light- and noise pollution can displace bats from their foraging sites and that light and ultrasonic noise pollution should be mitigated around critical bat habitats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.