ArticleScientific reports2026
Reimbursement restrictions reduce liver fibrosis screening in adults with diabetes in Ontario: a population-based interrupted time series analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adults with type 2 diabetes have increased risk of liver fibrosis, leading guidelines to recommend screening with the Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4). We assessed if modifications to Ontario Health Insurance Plan coverage of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) tests in 2013 were associated with changes in liver fibrosis assessment rates among adults with diabetes. This population-based cohort study included adults with diabetes and no history of liver disease in Ontario, Canada, from 2010 to 2022. Policy periods were constructed based on AST reimbursement practices. The primary outcome was the receipt of all laboratory tests needed to calculate FIB-4 (AST, alanine aminotransferase, and platelet count). Modified Poisson regression estimated the adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for predictors of receiving liver fibrosis assessment. Interrupted time series analysis employed autoregressive integrated moving average models to assess both immediate and sustained policy effects. This study included 1,680,451 individuals; 47% were female; median age was 64 years [IQR, 55-73 years]. The annual proportion without any testing ranged from 39 to 47%. The risk of receiving all required tests for FIB-4 declined significantly: 12.7% (aRR 0.873, 0.869-0.877) during implementation, 33.9% (aRR 0.661, 0.657-0.664) post-intervention, and 63.1% (aRR 0.369, 0.366-0.371) COVID-19. Interrupted time-series analysis showed a significant immediate decline in monthly testing of FIB-4 components (- 0.38; 95% CI - 0.59 to - 0.18), followed by a continued monthly decrease (- 0.03; 95% CI - 0.07 to 0.01). Restricting AST reimbursement was associated with a decline in liver fibrosis assessments for people with diabetes despite increasing consensus in favor of preventative screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.