ArticleScientific reports2026
Multivariate source apportionment and integrated indexical assessment of heavy metal contamination in northeast Indian wetland sediments and soils.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Notwithstanding the indispensable function of wetlands as environmental sentinels, comprehensive multivariate appraisals of heavy metal contamination and concomitant ecological hazards remain profoundly scarce within biodiverse, understudied regions like northeastern India. This critical knowledge gap persists despite escalating anthropogenic pressures and unique local geochemical conditions that modulate metal dynamics and bioavailability. To address this empirical deficit, an all-inclusive analysis of sediments and soils from 19 representative wetlands, including the Ramsar-designated Loktak Pat, was conducted for seven priority metals (Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu, Pb, Hg, As). Multivariate source apportionment via principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a dominant geogenic/lithogenic influence, with the first PC (PC1) accounting for 67.5% and 67.3% of variance in sediments and soils, respectively. This was evidenced by substantial loadings for Fe, Mn, Cu, Pb, Hg, and As. A secondary, less consequential component (PC2; ~ 14% variance) exhibited elevated Zn contributions, intimating potential but limited anthropogenic enrichment. A suite of sophisticated indices, geo-accumulation (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), and integrated ecological risk index (RI) collectively demonstrated low pollution states (PLI < 1, Igeo < 0) and negligible ecological risk (RI < 150). Modified hazard quotient (mHQ), toxic risk index (TRI), and hazard index (HI) assessments further confirmed insignificant non-carcinogenic risks to adjacent human populations (HI < 1). Enrichment factors for most metals were < 3, affirming minimal anthropogenic derivation, with the singular exception of localized Cu enrichment (EF 20-22) at sites like Pumlen Pat and Loktak Pat, which may be linked to legacy agricultural phosphate fertilizers or catchment erosion of mineralized soils. This enrichment did not, however, translate to elevated integrated risk. This integrative study confirms that these wetlands are presently low-risk systems for heavy metal pollution. The pronounced geogenic variance structure indicates anthropogenic activities have not substantially perturbed regional metal cycles. These findings accentuate the utility of multi-index frameworks, providing an indispensable baseline for conservation. Sustained, high-resolution monitoring, augmented by isotopic tracking, is unequivocally recommended to preemptively safeguard these vital ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.