Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056138›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

Mapping the Landscape of Open Access Dashboards - A Dataset for Research and Infrastructure Development.

Johannes Schneider, Heinz Pampel

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Johannes SchneiderHelmholtz-Association, Helmholtz Open Science Office, Telegrafenberg, 14473, Potsdam, Germany. johannes.schneider@os.helmholtz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6510-166X
Heinz PampelHelmholtz-Association, Helmholtz Open Science Office, Telegrafenberg, 14473, Potsdam, Germany. heinz.pampel@hu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3334-2771

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 528466070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As Open Access continues to gain importance in science policy, understanding the proportion of Open Access publications relative to the total research output of research-performing organizations, individual countries, or even globally has become increasingly relevant. In response, dashboards are being developed to capture and communicate progress in this area. To provide an overview of these dashboards and their characteristics, an extensive survey was conducted, resulting in the identification of over 60 dashboards. To support a detailed and structured description, a dedicated metadata schema was developed, and the identified dashboards were systematically indexed accordingly. We provide an openly reusable dataset and an interoperable metadata schema that enable comparative and longitudinal analyses of Open Access dashboards across regions and operator types, and we invite the community to reuse, extend, and refine them. The dataset is particularly relevant for researchers in Library and Information Science and Science and Technology Studies, supporting both empirical analyses of Open Access and the methodological refinement of indicators and policy instruments in the context of Open Science.

Identifiers

PMID42056138
PMCPMC13128897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.