ArticleNature communications2026
MechFind: a computational framework for de novo prediction of enzyme mechanisms.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methods for the establishment of enzymatic mechanisms - from QM to ML.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Mechanism-informed rules tunably balance novelty and feasibility of predicted enzymatic reactions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fewer than one thousand cataloged mechanistic annotations can be found in the open literature and databases. Here, we introduce MechFind, a computational tool that generates element and charge-balanced putative enzyme mechanisms using only the reaction stoichiometry. Unlike methods requiring structural data, MechFind abstracts reaction steps as changes in chemical moieties. It identifies the most parsimonious mechanistic descriptions and re-ranks them based on similarity to known mechanisms. MechFind recovers the validated mechanism for 72% of a curated training dataset within the top ten predictions and is indirectly validated on enzymes absent from the training set. When applied on 14,931 reactions from the Rhea database, MechFind identifies plausible mechanisms for 57% of all entries, generating over 18,000 hypotheses. This resource significantly expands mechanistic annotation and provides detailed reaction steps to support de novo enzyme design and engineering. All codes, curated datasets, and results are available at https://github.com/maranasgroup/MechFind.git (Commit Hash: fcc0896).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.