ArticleNutrition & diabetes2026
Distinct meal timing and frequency patterns contribute to daily glycemic variability.
Article in Nutrition & diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glycemic variability is an emerging marker of metabolic health, yet its behavioral determinants in healthy populations remain unclear. This study investigated whether meal patterns-specifically timing, distribution, and frequency-are associated with glycemic variability. Ninety-six individuals aged 18-27 years wore continuous glucose monitors for 14 consecutive days, providing 1036 complete daily records. Daily glucose profiles were clustered using dynamic time warping, and concurrent meal and sleep logs were analyzed to characterize dietary patterns across clusters. Cluster 2 (765 days) exhibited broader distributions and higher densities of elevated glucose values compared with cluster 1 (271 days), reflecting greater variability (17.7% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.0001). Peak daily glucose was also significantly higher in cluster 2, although average glucose did not differ. Total energy intake was lower in cluster 2 than cluster 1 (1781.1 vs. 1981.4 kcal, p = 0.0003), with no significant differences in macronutrient composition. By contrast, meal patterns differed substantially: cluster 2 was characterized by fewer eating occasions, later breakfast timing, and a greater proportion of daily energy intake at dinner. These findings suggest that meal timing and distribution are important dimensions of dietary recommendations, indicating a shift in focus from nutrient intake alone toward including meal patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.