ArticleCell death & disease2026
Vitamin D receptor isoform VDRA suppresses hepatocellular tumorigenesis by restricting YAP nuclear localization.
Article in Cell death & disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) frequently arises from uncontrolled proliferation of hepatocyte epithelium, a process potently driven by the transcriptional regulator yes-associated protein (YAP). Although 1,25(OH)₂D₃, the active form of vitamin D, exerts established anti-proliferative effects through its receptor (VDR), the specific roles of its two principal isoforms, VDRA and VDRB1, have remained largely undefined. Clinical analysis of the TCGA-LIHC database identified high VDRB1 and low VDRA expression as robust independent risk factors for poor prognosis, suggesting their divergent impacts on HCC progression. Here, we demonstrated that 1,25(OH)₂D₃ induced coordinate expression of both VDR isoforms in HCC cells, activated divergent transcriptional programs, particularly concerning the regulation of YAP target genes. Crucially, functional overexpression assays revealed that VDRA, but not VDRB1, potently inhibited YAP activation, an effect synergistically augmented by combined treatment with 1,25(OH)₂D₃. This regulatory axis was further substantiated by endogenous VDR silencing, while the VDRA-mediated repression of YAP signaling was substantially abrogated by constitutively active YAP-5SA. Functionally, VDRA impaired the proliferation and colony-forming capacity of HCC cells-an inhibitory action significantly rescued by YAP-5SA overexpression-whereas VDR knockdown promoted cell growth. Mechanistically, VDRA efficiently translocated to the nucleus to restrict YAP nuclear localization, while 1,25(OH)₂D₃-treated VDRB1 formed perinuclear condensates that failed to enter the nucleus. To confirm these mechanisms, we employed patient-derived HCC organoids (validated by H&E, RNA-seq, and WES). Subcutaneous engraftment demonstrated that VDRA overexpression, but not VDRB1, profoundly suppressed tumor growth by attenuating YAP activity. Taken together, our findings establish the VDRA isoform as the primary mediator of 1,25(OH)₂D₃-induced tumor suppression in HCC. By demonstrating that VDRA curtails hepatocarcinogenesis specifically by restricting YAP nuclear localization, this study delineates a novel isoform-specific mechanism within the vitamin D signaling axis, nominating VDRA as a promising biomarker and therapeutic target for YAP-driven liver cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.