ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2026
Revisiting the Association Between Calcium Channel Blockers and Parkinson's Disease in the E3N Cohort.
Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies on calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and Parkinson's disease (PD) risk reached conflicting conclusions.
objectivesWe examined the relationship between CCBs and PD in the E3N cohort of French women followed for 15 years (2004-2018), while taking into account the potential for reverse causation.
methodsNew users of CCBs were identified using drug reimbursement databases. We validated incident PD using several data sources. We described trajectories of CCBs use using mixed logistic models within a nested case-control study. We used Cox proportional hazards models for time-varying variables to estimate the association between CCBs (overall, amlodipine, non-amlodipine dihydropyridines [DiCCBs], non-dihydropyridines [non-DiCCBs]) and PD. Main analyses used a 5-year lag; sensitivity analyses without a lag were performed for comparison.
resultsAmong 82,605 women, 603 developed PD and 13,022 used CCBs. Women who started non-DiCCBs had higher PD risk than never users (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.56; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.99-2.46; P-trend ≤ 0.02). Among non-DiCCBs, diltiazem was associated with PD (HR = 2.20 [95% CI = 1.19-4.04]). There were no significant associations for CCBs overall, amlodipine, and non-amlodipine DiCCBs. In analyses without a lag, amlodipine (HR = 1.45 [95% CI = 1.13-1.87]) and diltiazem (HR = 1.63 [95% CI = 1.02-2.60]) were associated with PD. Results are consistent with trajectories of CCBs prescriptions in PD patients and controls. DISCUSSION: Overall, CCBs were not associated with PD but women who started using diltiazem had higher PD incidence in lagged analyses. Diltiazem and amlodipine were associated with PD in analyses without a lag. These findings are consistent with case reports of parkinsonism induced by specific CCBs and warrant further studies and surveillance. © 2026 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.