Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056011›Full record

ReviewJournal of audiology & otology2026

Mild but Not Minor: Reconsidering Clinical Practice and Tinnitus-Related Aspects of Mild Hearing Loss.

Hantai Kim, Jong Bin Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of audiology & otology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hantai KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR.
Jong Bin LeeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mild hearing loss, though often overlooked, can substantially affect daily communication and quality of life. Conventional hearing aids remain the mainstay of hearing loss management, yet their high cost has limited their widespread adoption. Recently, alternative amplification devices, such as personal sound amplification products (PSAPs) and over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids, have gained attention. Emerging evidence suggests that these devices may provide meaningful benefits to individuals with mild hearing loss and could help expand accessibility. Patients with tinnitus may particularly benefit from amplification, because hearing aids improve tinnitus-related outcomes. However, professionals are not usually involved in the purchase and use of PSAPs and OTC hearing aids. This may lead to suboptimal or even harmful results, especially in tinnitus care, for which counselling and cognitive behavioral therapy are essential components of comprehensive management. Amplification alone should not be considered a sufficient treatment strategy. Ultimately, while PSAPs and OTC hearing aids offer promising and cost-effective options for managing mild hearing loss, their integration into clinical practice requires careful consideration. Clear guidelines and professional consensus are needed to ensure that these devices are used appropriately and effectively, maximizing benefits while minimizing potential risks.

Indexed as

Hearing aidsMild hearing lossOver-the-counter hearing aidsPersonal sound amplification productsTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID42056011
PMCPMC13129891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.