ReviewJournal of audiology & otology2026
Educational Counseling for Tinnitus Management: A Scoping Review of Intervention Structure, Content, and Outcomes.
Review in Journal of audiology & otology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Educational counseling is a fundamental component of tinnitus management; however, its structure, content, and clinical outcomes vary. This scoping review analyzed ten peer-reviewed studies to inform the development of standardized, evidence-based protocols. Three studies evaluated educational counseling alone, whereas seven combined it with other therapeutic approaches. Most interventions delivered key content during an initial session. Six studies employed individual face-to-face formats, whereas four compared delivery modes, including individual versus group or traditional versus technology-assisted methods. Counseling content was typically derived from expert consensus or prior research, and three studies explicitly described the theoretical rationales underlying their counseling frameworks. Core topics included auditory anatomy and tinnitus pathophysiology, although these topics were occasionally omitted from brief sessions. Nine studies presented practical management strategies, and five studies tailored content using individual hearing and tinnitus profiles. All studies used self-report measures, with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory being the most common. Some studies reported improvements from counseling alone, whereas others showed outcome differences when counseling was combined with hearing aids or sound therapy, or delivered in alternative formats. This heterogeneity underscores the need for clearer and more standardized clinical protocols, as outcomes may vary depending on the content provided, patient characteristics, delivery method, patient's understanding, and application of information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.