ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Lower Limb Symmetry Index in Cavus and Normal Feet by Means of a Baropodometric Platform: A Case-Control Study.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-arched feet affect approximately 10%-15% of the general population. Although the relationship between plantar pressure and bilateral symmetry is well studied, there is limited evidence regarding the use of Symmetry Index and pressure platforms. The objective of the study is to compare dynamic foot pressures and Symmetry Index during gait between subjects with Pes Cavus and subjects with normal feet. The analysis of asymmetric pressure patterns could benefit from studies that compare dynamic foot pressures and Symmetry Index values in subjects with high-arched feet and normal feet. This analysis can promote better clinical understanding of gait alterations and help solve biomechanical problems that may lead to pathologies, as well as prevent and treat them. A descriptive case-control study was developed from October to December 2024 with 82 participants, 41 with Pes Cavus and 41 normal feet and 71 females of 25.52 ± 5.99 years through a consecutive nonrandom technique. For this study, a baropodometry platform (Neo-Plate, Herbitas) was used, which acquired dynamic gait with a 2-step protocol. The inclusion criteria regarding the selection of subjects were age 18-65 years; if both cavus feet, Navicular Drop Test (NDT) < 9 mm; neutral feet and no lower limb problem or surgery. Regarding SI use, the PC demonstrated to have large asymmetries compared to the control group. Left anterior pressure was lower (44.93% ± 4.59% vs. 48.60% ± 3.43%, p = 0.014), left posterior pressure was higher (55.07% ± 4.58% vs. 51.40% ± 3.43%, p = 0.013) and the left Initial Contact Phase (ICP) was prolonged (123.34 ± 51.75 ms vs. 91.30 ± 31.86 ms, p = 0.036); right medial pressure was higher (58.18% ± 4.08% vs. 53.77% ± 4.79%, p = 0.034). SI measurements were greater in normal foot group than in the PC group with SI 94.15% ± 5.00% versus 93.75% ± 4.59%, p = 0.001, respectively; ICP and lateral SI were both p = 0.001. Findings confirmed that subjects with cavus feet tend to present greater alterations in bilateral symmetry, specifically posteromedial pressure movements and altered gait phases, which are indicative of more probability of future injuries. For this reason, pressure platforms are excellent tools for understanding, analysing and therefore applying the correct treatment according to the SI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.