ArticleThe Journal of eukaryotic microbiology
Eukaryovorous Predation in Evolutionarily Significant Excavate-Like Flagellates.
Article in The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accumulating evidence suggests that the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor (LECA) resembled contemporary excavates, a non-monophyletic group of deep branching flagellates. Here we explore the functional ecology of distantly related deep-branching "excavate-like" flagellates (in Alveolata and Provora) that share with many excavates a vane-bearing posterior flagellum beating in association with a ventral groove. This arrangement is key to generating a feeding current in the bacterivorous typical excavates. However, the four species examined here are motile "hunters" that randomly encounter eukaryotic prey. Initial prey attachment may be facilitated by the force generated by the vaned flagellum but eventually by firing extrusomes. Propulsion is driven by the two flagella that are directed backwards. Despite minor differences, the propulsion and hunting strategies are similar between these two deep-branching groups and distinctly different from those found in typical excavates. While the vane-and-groove morphology may help prey attachment, simulations show that it seems energetically disadvantageous to propulsion. Thus, its overall role, origin, and phylogenetic implications remain unclear. This study adds to our knowledge of the functional ecological range of living vane- and groove-bearing flagellates. Given their significance to understanding early eukaryote evolutionary history, this may in turn shed light on the deep history of eukaryote life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.