Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42055916›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2026

'Light at the end of the tunnel': reactions to targeted and generally applicable reduced nicotine policy messages among priority populations of people who smoke.

Di Pei, Adebusola Ogunnaike, Winnie Ni, Jordan D Foster, Folashayo P Adeniji, Vanessa Mallory, Nurul Kodriati, Samantha L Petillo, Katherine C Henderson, Aubrey Juris and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Di PeiDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-185X
Adebusola OgunnaikeDepartment of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2451-2867
Winnie NiDepartment of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Jordan D FosterDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Folashayo P AdenijiDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Vanessa MalloryDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1997-1474
Nurul KodriatiDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Samantha L PetilloDepartment of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Katherine C HendersonDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9905-8648
Aubrey JurisDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Prudence NkansahNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5880-9111
James F ThrasherDepartment of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6418-4863
Nicholas A GiordanoNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0112-6214
Claire Adams SpearsDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7869-5661
David L AshleyTRSConsulting56 LLC, Lilburn, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-5893
Christin D'OvidioPutney Consulting, Bow, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4562-5409
Terry Frank PechacekDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4887-1254
Lucy PopovaDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA lpopova1@gsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3450-4579

Funding

Communicating about nicotine tobacco product standard in cigar productsR01CA239308 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Lyudmila Popova · 2019 to 2026
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking remains disproportionately high among people with serious psychological distress (SPD) and low socioeconomic status (SES). The US Food and Drug Administration proposed reducing nicotine in combusted tobacco products to minimally addictive levels. Effective messaging is needed to explain very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs) and to motivate these priority groups to use the policy to quit.

methodsIn 2024, we conducted 12 focus groups (n=70) in Atlanta, GA, with adults who smoked: individuals experiencing SPD (n=18), low SES (n=27) and neither (n=25). Participants reviewed and discussed 12-14 VLNC messages, including two targeted themes (anxiety/medication for SPD; financial cost for low SES) and three general themes (quitting benefits, regaining control and managing cravings). Data were analysed in NVivo 14.0 using thematic analysis.

resultsAcross groups, financial cost messages motivated participants to consider quitting, particularly when emphasising that VLNCs would cost the same as current cigarettes. Participants with SPD found SPD-targeted messages relatable, but some questioned whether nicotine worsens anxiety. General messages resonated broadly, promoting hope, empowerment and self-reflection. Craving management messages were seen as practical and spurred personal discussions. Visuals featuring relatable characters and believable scenarios enhanced receptivity.

conclusionsUnder a reduced nicotine policy, general messages highlighting quitting benefits, regaining control and managing cravings could anchor cessation campaigns. Targeted elements should still address salient barriers for people with SPD (contextualising nicotine's relationship to anxiety), but mixed responses suggest further refinement is needed. Financial cost messages, although designed for low SES audiences, resonated across all groups and could be used broadly.

Indexed as

CessationNicotineSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID42055916
PMCPMC13224332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.