ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2026
Mechanical properties and antibacterial efficacy against Streptococcus mutans biofilms of novel bioactive tooth root coatings in tooth-brushing simulation.
Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aging population is retaining more natural teeth, increasing the prevalence of exposed root surfaces. These surfaces are prone to abrasion, erosion, and biofilm accumulation, leading to tissue loss, hypersensitivity, and root caries. The objectives of this study were to: (1) evaluate the surface and mechanical properties of experimental resin coatings containing dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate (DMAHDM) and nanoparticles of amorphous calcium phosphate (NACP) following simulated toothbrushing, and (2) assess their antibacterial efficacy and protective effects compared with commercial controls.
methodsExperimental groups with urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA)/ triethylene glycol divinylbenzyl ether (TEGDVBE)+ 5% DMAHDM+ 10% (EX1) or 20% NACP (EX2), along with commercial controls (Seal&Protect and Vanish XT), were tested. Sound and artificially-demineralized dentin served as controls. Hardness, surface roughness, surface loss, and water contact angle were assessed before and after 10,000 brushing cycles. Additionally, Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) biofilm colony-forming units (CFU) was measured, and surface morphology was evaluated using SEM.
resultsEX2 and Seal&Protect had similar hardness (0.12 ± 0.01)GPa (n = 5, p > 0.05), while the hardness values of EX1 and demineralized dentin were lower (0.09 ± 0.01)GPa and (0.07 ± 0.01)GPa (p < 0.05). After 10,000 cycles of brushing, EX1, EX2, and Seal&Protect maintained smooth surfaces (R SIGNIFICANCE: The DMAHDM-NACP UDMA/TEGDVBE resin coating demonstrated surface and mechanical properties comparable to Seal&Protect and superior surface stability compared to Vanish XT, while achieving potent antibacterial activity not observed in either commercial control. These findings indicate strong potential for this multifunctional resin coating to protect tooth root dentin via physical shielding and sustained antibacterial performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.