ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2026
Development and validation of a risk stratification tool for predicting COPD exacerbations in patients without prior exacerbation history.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute exacerbations (AEs) drive disease progression and healthcare burden in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although prior AE history is the strongest predictor of future events, it cannot guide risk assessment in AE-naïve patients, highlighting the need for new prediction tools.
methodIn this retrospective multicentre cohort study, we enrolled training and validation cohorts from five hospitals. Baseline demographics, symptom scores, spirometry, blood eosinophils and comorbidities were extracted from electronic records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors and convert into score-based models.
resultThe training and validation cohorts included 310 and 86 AE-naïve patients with COPD, respectively. Independent predictors of 1-year AEs included coexisting asthma, modified Medical Research Council score ≥2, blood eosinophils ≥2%, per cent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s <50% and cardiovascular comorbidities (ie, heart failure and ischaemic cerebrovascular events). Three models were developed with areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.727 to 0.750 and 0.717 to 0.728 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. At the optimal cutoffs, the sensitivity ranged from 76.7% to 88.2% and specificity from 42.0% to 65.7%. Risk stratification separated patients into low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk groups in validation cohort, with increasing AE rates (0.10, 0.43 and 0.86 events/year, respectively; P for trend=0.0047).
conclusionBy incorporating baseline AE history, the externally validated, score-based prediction models provide a practical tool to estimate 1-year AE risk in patients with COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.