ArticleBMJ open2026
Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns are critical indicators of potential adverse outcomes for the fetus during pregnancy. Early detection and identification of predictors are essential for reducing preventable neonatal mortality. Despite being one of the leading causes of neonatal death, there is limited evidence regarding the prevalence and predictors of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns in Ethiopia.
objectiveThis study aims to assess the prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and the associated factors among labouring mothers in public hospitals within the Wolaita Zone of Southern Ethiopia.
methodsA facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 334 labouring mothers in public hospitals within the Wolaita Zone from 1 to 30 July 2024. Study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. Data were collected through interviewer-administered questionnaires and chart reviews. The collected data were entered into EpiData version 4.6 and subsequently exported to SPSS V.26 for analysis. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with the outcome variable. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted ORs (AORs) with 95% CIs were reported, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsThe prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns was 19.2% (95% CI 15.0 to 23.9). Labour augmentation (AOR 3.28, 95% CI 1.72 to 6.27), referred from other healthcare facilities (AOR 3.39, 95% CI 1.70 to 6.76), primigravida (AOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.74) and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (AOR 4.52, 95% CI 2.10 to 9.75) were significantly associated with non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns.
conclusionThe prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns was found to be high. Consequently, it is essential to enhance intrapartum monitoring and prompt management of these risk factors, particularly among primigravida women and mothers transferred from other healthcare institutions to reduce the risk of adverse fetal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.