ArticleBMJ open2026
Prevalence and potential risk factors of short birth interval among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh: a population-based cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShort birth interval is an important reproductive health concern in low- and middle-income countries, including Bangladesh, as it may have adverse consequences for both perinatal and maternal health. According to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes O09.891, O09.892 and O09.893, pregnancies occurring after a short interpregnancy interval are classified as high-risk pregnancies that require appropriate medical supervision. Understanding the risk factors associated with short birth intervals is crucial for designing effective interventions and achieving the maternal and child health targets outlined in the Sustainable Development Goals. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence and identify the potential risk factors of short birth interval using a two-level logistic regression (LR) model and the Boruta machine learning (ML) based feature selection method.
designThis was a cross-sectional study.
settingThe study used secondary data from the nationally representative Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2022.
participantsThe study included 11 872 married women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Bangladesh who reported at least one previous live birth. The demographic, socioeconomic, reproductive and media exposure-related characteristics of the study participants were obtained from the BDHS 2022 dataset.
methodsA two-level LR model was used to identify the risk factors associated with short birth interval, and the results were presented as adjusted ORs (aORs) with 95% CIs and p values <0.05. Additionally, the Boruta ML method was applied to determine the important predictors of short birth intervals. The overlapping risk factors identified by both the LR model and the Boruta method were considered potential risk factors of short birth intervals among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh. Subsequently, three widely used ML models were implemented in the study. The performance of each model was evaluated on the test dataset using five evaluation metrics, namely accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
resultsIn Bangladesh, the prevalence of short birth intervals was 34%. Both the two-level LR model and the Boruta method identified women aged ≤19 years (aOR=6.496, 95% CI 2.900 to 14.551; p<0.001); residence in Sylhet (aOR=2.457, 95% CI 1.956 to 3.086; p<0.001), Chattogram (aOR=1.554, 95% CI 1.279 to 1.887; p<0.001), Dhaka (aOR=1.287, 95% CI 1.059 to 1.565; p=0.011), Mymensingh (aOR=1.394, 95% CI 1.118 to 1.738; p=0.003) and Rangpur (aOR=1.248, 95% CI 1.009 to 1.543; p=0.041) divisions; no education (aOR=1.399, 95% CI 1.078 to 1.816; p=0.011); poorest (aOR=1.364, 95% CI 1.146 to 1.624; p<0.001), poorer (aOR=1.230, 95% CI 1.042 to 1.452; p=0.014) and middle wealth quintile (aOR=1.196, 95% CI 1.022 to 1.399; p=0.025); use of traditional contraceptive methods (aOR=1.615, 95% CI 1.305 to 1.998; p<0.001) and no intention to use contraception (aOR=1.506, 95% CI 1.237 to 1.833; p<0.001); birth order ≥4 (aOR=1.467, 95% CI 1.243 to 1.730; p<0.001); and having more than two children ever born (aOR=2.777, 95% CI 2.455 to 3.141; p<0.001) as potential risk factors for short birth interval among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh. Among the ML-based models, the extreme gradient boosting model achieved the highest performance, with an accuracy of 66.356% in predicting short birth intervals.
conclusionThe findings highlight that women aged ≤19 years, those residing in the Eastern and Central divisions, women with no formal education, lower household wealth quintile, traditional or no intention to use contraceptive methods, higher birth order and having more than two children were potential risk factors for short birth interval. The extreme gradient boosting classifier showed the best performance in predicting short birth intervals among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.