Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42055548›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2026

1950-2000: five decades of curiosity-driven discovery in alternative DNA structures.

David Monchaud

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David MonchaudUniversité Bourgogne Europe (UBE), Institut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne (ICMUB) CNRS UMR6302, 21078 Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3056-9295

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-22-CE44-0039-01Bourgogne Franche Comté (BFC) Regional CouncilCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueEuropean UnionUniversité Bourgogne Europe
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1953 was a watershed year in the history of science, indelibly linked to the discovery of DNA's double-helix structure by James Watson, Francis Crick, Maurice Wilkins, and Rosalind Franklin. However, this landmark achievement has often eclipsed the rapid succession of discoveries that followed in its wake, findings that collectively revealed the remarkable structural plasticity of DNA. These early insights, though initially overshadowed, have since re-emerged as cornerstones in the study of alternative DNA structures, notably G-quadruplexes (G4s), which today are not only studied for understanding the roles they play in cellular processes but also hold promise as targets for therapeutic interventions. By revisiting these foundational discoveries-notably the discovery of the many forms of DNA including A-DNA, B-DNA, G4, i-motif, R-loop, triplex-DNA, Z-DNA, 3WJ, and 4WJ-we not only gain a deeper appreciation of their historical significance but also recognize how, in just a few decades, they laid the groundwork for modern nucleic acid research and its far-reaching applications.

Indexed as

DNANucleic Acid ConformationDNA, A-FormDNA, B-FormDNA, Z-FormG-QuadruplexesHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansDNADNA, A-FormDNA, B-FormDNA, Z-Form

Identifiers

PMID42055548
PMCPMC13125764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.