ArticleActa psychologica2026
Momentary associations between purpose in life and social connection from a micro-longitudinal study of everyday life.
Article in Acta psychologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a well-established association between purpose in life and social connection, measured cross-sectionally and longitudinally over years. The present study uses ecological momentary assessment to shrink the timescale to daily life to identify dynamic associations between purpose and social connection within and between assessments throughout the day. Participants (N = 303) reported their feelings of purpose and aspects of social connection (appreciated, lonely, criticized) at three semi-random times each day for eight days. In moments when participants felt more purpose-driven than their average, they felt more appreciated and less lonely and criticized (median |b| = 0.08, p < .001). Likewise, in moments individuals felt more appreciated and less lonely and criticized than their average, they felt more purpose-driven (median |b| = 0.24, p < .001). Some associations persisted across assessments throughout the day: Feeling more purpose-driven in one moment was associated with feeling more appreciated and less lonely at the next momentary assessment and feeling more appreciated in one moment was associated with feeling more purpose-driven at the next momentary assessment. Loneliness measured in one momentary assessment, however, did not erode purpose in the next momentary assessment. This work provides support for momentary dynamics between purpose and social connection that may contribute to their longer-term associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.