ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Antiproliferative Effects of Cannabinoids and Cisplatin in Cervical Cancer Cells.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cannabinoids in Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms of Tumor Cell Death and Translational Opportunities.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Identification of Changes in the Transcriptome Profile of Human Hepatoma HepG2 Cells Exposed to Combined Sorafenib and Cannabis Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Cisplatin, a standard chemotherapeutic agent, is limited by severe toxicities and chemoresistance. This study aimed to assess the effects of cisplatin in combination with phytocannabinoids, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) on cell proliferation, morphology, cell cycle progression, cell death, and DNA damage.
methodsSynergistic interactions between THC, CBD, and cisplatin were assessed in HeLa, SiHa, and MCF-12A cells using the checkerboard assay and SRB assay. Cell morphology, cell cycle progression, apoptosis induction, autophagic activity, and DNA repair gene expression were evaluated using various techniques.
resultsThe THC-CBD-cisplatin combination exhibited the strongest apoptotic response in cancer cells (HeLa 53%, SiHa 58%), while minimally affecting MCF-12A cells (32%). Cannabinoid co-treatment amplified the antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of cisplatin in HeLa and SiHa cells. The triple combination induced a G2/M arrest in HeLa cells and sub-G1 accumulation in SiHa cells. Autophagic activity, indicated by LC3B puncta formation, increased in HeLa and SiHa cells following THC and CBD exposure. DNA repair genes XRCC1 and RAD51 were downregulated by the cannabinoid-cisplatin combination.
conclusionThese findings demonstrate that combining THC and CBD with cisplatin results in enhanced and mechanistically diverse anticancer effects, with a higher degree of selectivity for cervical cancer cells compared to non-cancerous MCF-12A cells by inducing apoptosis and autophagy while inhibiting DNA repair capacity. This study highlights the potential of cannabinoid-based combination therapies as a promising approach for cervical cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.