Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42055242›Full record

ReviewProgress in neurobiology2026

From peripersonal space to cognitive maps: An evolutionary perspective.

Summbla Anjum, Maria J Sosa, Andrea Serino, Jean-Paul Noel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Summbla AnjumDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.
Maria J SosaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.
Andrea SerinoMySpace Lab, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; NeuroRehab Research Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Institution of Lavigny, Switzerland.
Jean-Paul NoelDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, MN, USA; Minnesota Robotics Institute, University of Minnesota, MN, USA; Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, MN, USA. Electronic address: Noelx071@umn.edu.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UM1TR004405 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Bruce R Blazar, Damien A Fair · 2023 to 2026
$30.8M
Neural and Computational Architecture for Complex Navigation and Subjective Self-LocationR00NS128075 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Jean-Paul Noel · 2025 to 2026
$473k
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004405NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS128075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our brains support at least two major spatial representations: an egocentric, short-horizon representation of peripersonal space (PPS), and an allocentric, longer-horizon cognitive map system. Here, we speculate on their relationship from an evolutionary perspective. We argue that an ancient proto-PPS system for contact prediction likely emerged early in vertebrate evolution as a fight-or-flight mechanism for managing imminent threats, supported by evolutionarily conserved midbrain circuits such as the optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals). The subsequent transition of many species from aquatic to terrestrial environments dramatically expanded sensory ranges and environmental complexity, arguably creating selective pressures for longer-horizon navigation, prediction, and planning. These pressures likely contributed to the emergence of hippocampal and entorhinal systems supporting allocentric spatial representations. Next, as navigation and foraging behaviors became more sophisticated and required dexterous multi-joint movements, it is possible that a cortical PPS system emerged within neocortical networks, including posterior parietal and ventral premotor cortices. Rather than mediating coarse fight-or-flight responses, we suggest this cortical PPS system now supports fine-grained hierarchical sensorimotor control, reference-frame transformations, tool use, and social interactions. In parallel, the allocentric mapping systems seemingly expanded beyond spatial navigation to support relational, conceptual, and abstract cognitive structures. We suggest that PPS and cognitive maps instantiate shared computational principles operating at different spatial and temporal scales and in different reference frames; a view supported by recent reinforcement-learning frameworks linking body-centered and allocentric predictive value. Together, this perspective points to a putative scaffolded evolutionary trajectory in which cognition may have expanded from near-body safety to a multiscale predictive architecture supporting flexible, goal-directed behavior across space and time.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBrainCognitionPersonal SpaceSpace PerceptionAnimalsHumansBodily Self-ConsciousnessComputational NeuroscienceEvolutionNavigationSpaceSuccessor Representation

Identifiers

PMID42055242
PMCPMC13156910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.