ArticleInternational journal of hygiene and environmental health2026
Maternal residential proximity to oil and gas development in California and the risk of childhood cancer.
Article in International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates maternal residential proximity to oil and gas development (OGD) in pregnancy and the risk of multiple childhood cancers in California. Cases (N = 9487) were identified from California Cancer Registry and controls (N = 183834) were randomly selected from the California Birth Registry (20:1 frequency-matched by birth year: 1998-2016), restricting both to births within 10 km of OGD. Exposure was defined as residing within 1 km or 3 km of any well at birth; 'low' and 'high' exposures were defined by the median well count within each distance. Unconditional logistic regression models estimated cancer risks comparing each exposed group to the unexposed (residing 3-10 km from any well). The risks of several cancers among children of mothers exposed to any well increased: medulloblastoma (within 3 km: adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR): 1.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08, 1.82; low, aOR = 1.27; 95% CI = 0.93, 1.74; high, aOR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.14, 2.11); rhabdomyosarcoma (within 3 km: aOR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.28, 2.09) with similar estimates across low and high exposure levels; and teratoma (within 3 km: aOR = 1.42; 95% CI = 0.99, 2.05; low, aOR = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.88, 2.07; high, aOR = 1.51; 95% CI = 0.98, 2.33). The results were consistent across both buffer sizes (1 km and 3 km) and estimates were similar for any well and inactive wells. No clear associations were observed for other major childhood cancers including leukemias and lymphomas. Our study suggests that OGD may increase the risk of developing several rare childhood cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.