ArticleInternational dental journal2026
In Vitro Shear Bond Strength of Additively Manufactured Denture Base Resins to Hard Chairside Reline Materials.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsReliable bonding between additively manufactured denture base resins and hard chairside reline materials is essential for long-term clinical performance, yet evidence under simulated aging conditions remains limited. This in vitro study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) of two hard chairside reline materials to conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and two additively manufactured denture base resins under thermocycling conditions simulating relining at denture delivery and after clinical service.
methodsOne heat-polymerized PMMA resin and two additively manufactured denture base resins composed of urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) and methacrylate ester monomer (MA) were bonded to Tokuyama Rebase II (R) or Ufi Gel Hard (U), forming six material combinations. Specimens were assigned to three conditions: non-thermocycling (NT), thermocycling before relining (TB), or thermocycling after relining (TA). Ten specimens were prepared per subgroup (n = 180). Specimens that exhibited complete debonding during thermocycling were assigned an SBS value of 0 MPa and included in the analysis. SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and failure modes were classified. Data were analysed using appropriate statistical tests (α = 0.05).
resultsSBS was significantly influenced by denture base resin type, reline material, and thermocycling condition (P < .05). U demonstrated higher SBS than R across all denture base resins. Under NT conditions, the MA-U group showed the highest SBS (6.78 ± 1.57 MPa), and the UDMA-R group showed the lowest (1.41 ± 0.49 MPa). After thermocycling, 80% of UDMA-R and 20% of MA-R specimens debonded, whereas no failures occurred in the U groups. R predominantly exhibited adhesive failures, while U mainly showed cohesive or mixed failures.
conclusionWithin the limitations of this in vitro study, bonding performance between denture base resins and hard chairside reline materials was influenced by material compatibility and thermal aging. U demonstrated greater resistance to thermally induced debonding than R. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Appropriate selection of hard chairside reline materials for additively manufactured dentures can provide bonding performance comparable to conventional PMMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.