ArticleGynecologic oncology2026
Are patient factors associated with real-world antibody-drug conjugate outcomes in gynecologic cancers?
Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDisparities in clinical trial enrollment raise concerns about the generalizability of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) efficacy in gynecologic cancers. We evaluated real-world survival outcomes across demographic subgroups and assessed concordance with pivotal trials, while contextualizing findings within ongoing challenges of underrepresentation.
methodsWe conducted a cohort study of patients with advanced gynecologic cancers treated with ADCs at a tertiary academic center (June 2019-September 2025). Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by age, race, and ethnicity. Secondary objectives examined ECOG performance status, line of therapy, and Area Deprivation Index. Exploratory analyses assessed treatment discontinuation secondary to toxicity. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods with univariable and multivariable models.
resultsAmong 142 patients,105 received mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV), 34 trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and 16 tisotumab vedotin (TV). Median age was 64.8 years; 66.9% identified as White, 12.7% Asian, 6.3% Black/African American, and 14.1% Other. Most patients were non-Hispanic/Latina (88.7%), while 11.3% identified as Hispanic/Latina. In unadjusted analyses, PFS varied by treatment line in the MIRV cohort (p = 0.04), while OS differed by ethnicity and performance status (p < 0.01). Performance status was also associated with OS in the T-DXd cohort (p = 0.01). These associations were not significant in multivariable models. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 17.6% and did not differ by subgroup.
conclusionsReal-world ADC outcomes were consistent with pivotal trials, with no independent survival differences by subgroup after adjustment. These findings support continued investigation of clinical and structural factors influencing outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.