ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
Deep learning for discriminating cochlear malformations on temporal bone CT.
Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Image-based deep learning in otology: a state-of-the-art review.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDiagnosis of cochlear malformation on temporal bone CT images is often difficult because the imaging findings are frequently subtle. Our aim was to assess the utility of deep learning analysis in diagnosing cochlear malformation on temporal bone CT images.
methodsA total of 373 temporal bone CTs (187 with normal and 186 with malformed cochlea) were included in this study. The network Swin UNETR was used for cochlea automatic segmentation, then we divided it into left and right sides. three classification networks, ResNet50, EfficientNet-B0 and DenseNet121, were used for training to diagnose cochlear malformation (590 sides). The test set (149 sides) was analyzed using deep learning models and by otologists.
resultsThe average Dice coefficient of Swin UNETR was 0.93. The AUCs for ResNet50, EfficientNet-B0 and DenseNet121 were 0.93, 0.89 and 0.93, respectively, with DenseNet121 achieving the highest AUC among the four models. ResNet50 and DenseNet121 are better than otologists (1‒5 y).
conclusionThe deep learning technique may be a useful supportive tool for diagnosing cochlear malformation on temporal bone CT images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.