Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42054641›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Touch-Based Partner Yoga for Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Men in a Community Wellness Setting: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Program Evaluation of "The Studio".

Jesse Strunk Elkins, Travis R Scheadler, Pasquale E Rummo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jesse Strunk ElkinsDepartment of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC, 28223-0001, United States, 1 704-687-8622.ORCID 0009-0001-5604-9298
Travis R ScheadlerSchool of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3609-442X
Pasquale E RummoDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9285-5430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) is a well-established contributor to physical, psychological, and social well-being worldwide. Human touch also plays a vital role in life course health, yet opportunities for safe, consensual touch are often limited, particularly in LTPA settings. For gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (GBTQ) men, barriers to affirming LTPA spaces can make it particularly difficult to access such benefits. In response, community-based approaches that integrate touch are needed, alongside systematic evaluations of such strategies. "The Studio" (pseudonym), a membership-based wellness community, addresses this gap by offering touch-centered partner yoga and bodywork programs designed to support the holistic health of GBTQ men. Objective: This protocol describes a mixed methods evaluation of the Studio's touch-based yoga programming in New York City. The primary aim is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a touch-centered partner yoga program within a GBTQ community wellness setting. Secondary aims include exploring preliminary physical, emotional, and social outcomes associated with participation, including flexibility, stress, body awareness, social connection, trust, and belonging. Methods: The evaluation uses a pre- and posttest mixed methods design. A total of 40-50 participants will be recruited from new Studio members. Quantitative measures will include flexibility (sit-and-reach and goniometry), stress (Perceived Stress Scale), body awareness (Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness), and resilience (Brief Resilience Scale). Social network analysis will map participant connections before and after program participation. Qualitative data will be collected through semistructured interviews with 15-20 participants, or until saturation is reached, focusing on comfort with touch, emotional regulation, and experiences of community connectedness. Survey and interview guides will be codeveloped with a community advisory group to ensure cultural responsiveness and relevance. Findings will be integrated using triangulation methods to explore convergence across data sources. Results: As of March 2026, this study has not yet begun. Institutional Review Board submission is planned for September 2026. Afterward, study instruments will be finalized and pilot-tested with Studio teachers. Participant recruitment is projected to begin in July 2027, and data collection will include 3 time points (baseline, postintervention, and 4-6 wk follow-up). Data analysis and dissemination of findings are expected in 2028. Preliminary pilot testing of the survey instruments with Studio employees and community advisory group members will indicate feasibility and cultural fit. Conclusions: This evaluation will be among the first to systematically examine touch-focused partner yoga for GBTQ men in a community wellness setting. Findings are expected to provide novel insights into the feasibility and the role of intentional touch in LTPA spaces, support trauma-informed and inclusive wellness practices, and contribute to broader discourse on GBTQ health promotion and intervention. Results will be disseminated to the Studio employees, members, and GBTQ-focused wellness organizations, as well as through peer-reviewed publications and conferences.

Indexed as

Health PromotionSexual and Gender MinoritiesTouchTransgender PersonsYogaAdultExerciseFemaleHumansMaleProgram Evaluationleisuremixed methods researchphysical activitysexual and gender minoritiestouchyoga

Identifiers

PMID42054641
PMCPMC13128061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.