Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42054568›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2026

User Requirements of the Integrated Home-Based Rehabilitation Tool, Neurorehabilitation Ecosystem for Sustained Therapy: Multicenter Focus Group Study With Stroke Survivors, Caregivers, and Health Care Professionals.

Merle Matijsen, Cheriel Hofstad, Susana Rodriguez Gonzalez, Xavier Buxó, Vera Stara, Sara Leonzi, Margherita Rampioni, Anna Mura, Noël Keijsers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Merle MatijsenDepartment of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, Nijmegen, 6500 GM, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9284-7637
Cheriel HofstadDepartment of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, Nijmegen, 6500 GM, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3961-8396
Susana Rodriguez GonzalezDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR), Neurorehabilitation Unit, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6170-5253
Xavier BuxóDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR), Neurorehabilitation Unit, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6814-7373
Vera StaraCentre for Innovative Models for Aging Care and Technology, National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7536-7606
Sara LeonziCentre for Innovative Models for Aging Care and Technology, National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2907-4698
Margherita RampioniCentre for Innovative Models for Aging Care and Technology, National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9235-9923
Anna MuraInstitute of Neurosciences, University Miguel Hernández-CSIC, Alicante, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5673-1174
Noël KeijsersDepartment of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, Nijmegen, 6500 GM, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7835-7112

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Due to the high burden on health care, home-based rehabilitation (HBR) has gained increasing interest. A new HBR program for stroke survivors, containing a gaming app with upper-limb exercises, monitoring system, and virtual coach was being developed. Objective: This study aimed to assess the user requirements of an HBR tool including a gaming app, monitoring system, and virtual coach, and to examine potential differences between end users and countries. Methods: Thirteen stroke survivors, 12 caregivers, and 15 health care professionals from centers in the Netherlands, Italy, and Spain, participated in focus groups or interviews. Each center used the same interview guide with open questions about each component. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted separately at each center, and results were combined during a physical meeting. Results: User requirements were categorized into three main themes: (1) customization: aligning with individual preferences and capabilities; (2) motivational elements: these included reminders, a variety of levels and games, and ease of use; and (3) feedback elements: maintaining interactions with therapists. These themes apply to both home-based exercises as well as daily-life activities during HBR. There were minor differences between end users or centers. Conclusions: All end users across the participating countries emphasized the importance of integrating gamified exercises, monitoring, and virtual coaching into an HBR system. The user requirements for such a system can be categorized into three key areas: customization, motivational elements, and feedback elements.

Indexed as

healthcare professionalshome–based rehabilitationmulti–countryqualitative researchstrokeuser requirements

Identifiers

PMID42054568
PMCPMC13153746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.