ArticleJMIR human factors2026
On the Design of a Sign Language Corpus of Medical Terms for Automatic Translation Systems: Mixed Methods Approach.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hearing loss is a global health issue affecting millions and creating significant communication barriers, particularly in accessing health care services. These barriers can lead to complications and iatrogenic events, emphasizing the need for assistive technologies that enhance communication efficiency. Objective: This study aimed to develop a corpus of medical terms for the "Captar-Libras" project, designed to improve communication between health care professionals and deaf patients through a bidirectional sign language system. Methods: This study used the Delphi method to obtain consensus on key terms for a sign language translation system in health care emergency consultations. Initially, a questionnaire with common emergency questions was developed and distributed to health care professionals. The collected data were analyzed by a team of experts and adapted to Brazilian Sign Language (Língua Brasileira de Sinais [Libras]). Simulated clinical scenarios were then created to validate the system and ensure the accuracy of the vocabulary in the medical context. Results: Among the 16 participants, most were physicians (n=14, 87.5%) with experience in emergency care, and half had previously treated patients with hearing loss in emergency settings. The questions evaluated received high average importance scores, particularly those related to initial symptoms and pain intensity. Some suggestions for adjustments were made, with two wording modifications significantly improving clarity regarding smoking and alcohol use. Additional suggestions to enhance the medical interview were also proposed. This study aimed to identify essential questions for emergency consultations with deaf patients, focusing on developing a corpus for Libras recognition system. The findings emphasize the importance of effective communication and highlight the challenges of translating medical terms into Libras. To address these complexities, a multidisciplinary team used the Delphi method to ensure linguistic and cultural accuracy. Additionally, the study reinforces the need for clear, structured medical queries to improve accessibility in emergency care. As a next step, system validation through simulated scenarios will be conducted. Despite certain limitations, this research lays a solid foundation for advancing sign language recognition in medical settings. Conclusions: This study represents a significant methodological step toward improving communication between health care professionals and deaf individuals in emergency medical settings. Rather than proposing a universal solution, the study presents a structured and participatory approach for developing a corpus of medical terms in Libras, with interdisciplinary validation. The process included the involvement of deaf sign language experts during the translation and linguistic adaptation phase, ensuring that the corpus reflects authentic usage and articulation in Libras.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.