SynthesisJMIR aging2026
The Effectiveness of Digital Interventions to Increase Preventive Care Uptake in Older Adults: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Older adults face increasing health risks associated with aging and chronic disease; yet, uptake of recommended clinical preventive services remains low. Digital health interventions have the potential to enhance access and engagement, but their effectiveness in older adult populations remains unclear. Objective: This systematic review aimed to examine the range and types of digital clinical preventive service interventions and assess their impact on preventive care uptake among older adults. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed research literature published since 2014. Eligible studies included experimental and quasi-experimental designs evaluating digital interventions targeting community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and older. Interventions focused on high-priority preventive services, including cancer screening and adult immunizations. Data were extracted using a standardized form and synthesized narratively due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes. Results: In total, 24 studies involving over 1.3 million participants from 11 countries were included. Interventions used a range of digital tools, including telephone calls, SMS text messages, patient portals, and video-based education. While some digital and automated interventions demonstrated modest improvements in preventive services uptake, results were mixed. Interventions incorporating personalized elements (eg, tailored telephone counseling or in-person education) were generally more effective than generic, automated communications. Few studies reported on digital literacy support or intervention reach, and engagement with digital platforms was often low. Conclusions: Digital interventions can support modest improvements in preventive services uptake among older adults, particularly when personalized or combined with human interaction. However, assumptions of digital fluency and limited reporting on engagement constrain generalizability. Future research should prioritize inclusive design, detailed reporting, and strategies that address digital equity to better support older adult populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.