ArticlePloS one2026
Influence of k-wire placement on impact mechanics and bone fracture in a rabbit model of cartilage injury.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vivo rabbit models that deliver mechanical impacts to knee cartilage are important for studying injury-induced osteoarthritis, but variability in impact characteristics limit the repeatability of the models. In this study, the mechanical impact load delivered to a cadaveric rabbit posterior medial condyle was characterized, with particular emphasis on the influence of placement of the k-wire that stabilized the joint during impact. K-wire position was not prescribed and varied across specimens (7.85 ± 2.28 mm anterior and 2.61 ± 3.47 mm distal to the impact site) and was treated as a source of variability. Impact parameters and subchondral bone failure metrics were quantified, and their relationship with k-wire placement were evaluated using multiple linear regression. Peak stress, loading rate, impact duration and work were significantly associated with k-wire location in the sagittal plane, with these associations primarily driven by the anterior-posterior position of the k-wire. In contrast, the proximal-distal position was not a significant predictor for individual impact parameters. Consistency of the k-wire placement and resulting impact parameters were also assessed. With effort to reproduce a fixed placement, the coefficients of variation of the impact parameters were less than ~15%, indicating relatively consistent impacts. Additionally, regression analysis indicated that a substantial portion of fracture variability was accounted for by k-wire placement, suggesting that caution must be exercised in positioning the k-wire to prevent fractures. Collectively, these findings indicate that the stiff k-wire alters the compliance of the impacted tissue and influences the characteristics of the mechanical impact load and the susceptibility to subchondral bone fracture. These results highlight the importance of precise joint stabilization in impact-based osteoarthritis models and provide a foundation for future studies on cartilage injury, post-traumatic osteoarthritis disease progression, and novel therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.